Competitor profile

ESS KAY CONSTRUCTIONS

They win 21% of what they bid, and 13% of the value they chase.

38tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
2 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
38
38 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
20 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.8 Cr
of ₹21.5 Cr bid — 12.8% conversion
Win rate
21.1%
of 38 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count38 bids
21.1%
26.3%
52.6%
Awarded821.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1026.3%
Lost2052.6%
By value₹21.5 Cr
12.8%
24.4%
62.8%
Awarded₹2.8 Cr12.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.2 Cr24.4%
Lost₹13.5 Cr62.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

8 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
kailash chawla3 wins · 23 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Bharat Construction2 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
SAMTA INTERIORS3 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
04
CREATORS ENGINEERS AND INTERIORS1 win · 21 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
05
SIROHI CONSTRUCTION CO4 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
06
Heera Constructions3 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹23.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedESS KAY CONSTRUCTIONS awardedOthers

About ESS KAY CONSTRUCTIONS

ESS KAY CONSTRUCTIONS appears as a bidder on 38 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 38 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 21.1% win rate — worth ₹2.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Airports Authority of India, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against kailash chawla, Bharat Construction and SAMTA INTERIORS. kailash chawla bid on 23 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; ESS KAY CONSTRUCTIONS won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.