Competitor profile

Elite Constructions

They win 20% of what they bid, and 18% of the value they chase.

76tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
76
76 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
15
57 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.4 Cr
of ₹29.6 Cr bid — 18.2% conversion
Win rate
19.7%
of 76 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count76 bids
19.7%
75.0%
Awarded1519.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected45.3%
Lost5775.0%
By value₹29.6 Cr
18.2%
76.8%
Awarded₹5.4 Cr18.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.5 Cr5.0%
Lost₹22.7 Cr76.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

15 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
K. VENKATESH NAIDU1 win · 20 shared tenders
₹32.9 L
won head-to-head
02
archana enterprises1 win · 14 shared tenders
₹23.7 L
won head-to-head
03
the bhimani group of companies1 win · 12 shared tenders
₹38.9 L
won head-to-head
04
M/s Qureshi Construction Co1 win · 12 shared tenders
₹44.8 L
won head-to-head
05
joshua construction1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹21.8 L
won head-to-head
06
M AND V ENTERPRISES4 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedElite Constructions awardedOthers

About Elite Constructions

Elite Constructions appears as a bidder on 76 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 76 decided bids, it was awarded 15 — a 19.7% win rate — worth ₹5.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 10.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against K. VENKATESH NAIDU, archana enterprises and the bhimani group of companies. K. VENKATESH NAIDU bid on 20 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Elite Constructions won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.