Competitor profile

M/S ELECTROVISION

They win 14% of what they bid, and 15% of the value they chase.

14tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
16 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
14
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
12 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹81.9 L
of ₹5.5 Cr bid — 14.8% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 14 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count14 bids
14.3%
85.7%
Awarded214.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1285.7%
By value₹5.5 Cr
14.8%
85.2%
Awarded₹81.9 L14.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹4.7 Cr85.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Guru Charan Mahata0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Neha Enterprise4 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
SUMAN CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹54.5 L
won head-to-head
04
M/s Tekcon International0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S Tapan Sur1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹43.5 L
won head-to-head
06
ALLIANCE0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedELECTROVISION awardedOthers

About M/S ELECTROVISION

M/S ELECTROVISION appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 14 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹81.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 17.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Guru Charan Mahata, Neha Enterprise and SUMAN CONSTRUCTION. Guru Charan Mahata bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S ELECTROVISION won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.