Competitor profile

EFFECTIVE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

They win 67% of what they bid, and 66% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
3 Nov 2025last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹14
of ₹21 bid — 65.7% conversion
Win rate
66.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count6 bids
66.7%
16.7%
16.7%
Awarded466.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected116.7%
Lost116.7%
By value₹21
65.7%
14.9%
19.3%
Awarded₹1465.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹314.9%
Lost₹419.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Goa₹14

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Datta Kare Associates0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
KICONS LIMITED0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
FIVE ELEMENTS DESIGN CELL LLP0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
DEVENDRA PRABHU1 win · 1 shared tender
₹4
won head-to-head
05
VIJAYKUMAR SAWANT ASSOCIATES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
GRASSROOTS RESEARCH AND CONSULTANCY0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedEFFECTIVE ARCHITECTURAL awardedOthers

About EFFECTIVE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES

EFFECTIVE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 66.7% win rate — worth ₹14 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Nov 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is GOA STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, at 70.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Goa. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Datta Kare Associates, KICONS LIMITED and FIVE ELEMENTS DESIGN CELL LLP. Datta Kare Associates bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; EFFECTIVE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.