Competitor profile

E-VERVE DESIGN

They win 18% of what they bid, but only 5% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

17tenders on record
12buyer authorities
0states
27 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
17
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹83.5 L
of ₹17.7 Cr bid — 4.7% conversion
Win rate
17.6%
of 17 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count17 bids
17.6%
41.2%
41.2%
Awarded317.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected741.2%
Lost741.2%
By value₹17.7 Cr
43.4%
51.8%
Awarded₹83.5 L4.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹7.7 Cr43.4%
Lost₹9.2 Cr51.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Om Sai Sagar Traders0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
CIS GLOBAL INFRATECH PVT LTD0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/s Brand Kettle Projects Pvt. Ltd.0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Virender Kumar & Co.0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
RAM ANUJ0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Sunshine Enterprises0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedE-VERVE DESIGN awardedOthers

About E-VERVE DESIGN

E-VERVE DESIGN appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 12 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 17 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 17.6% win rate — worth ₹83.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 27 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate General of Trade Remedies, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 9.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Om Sai Sagar Traders, CIS GLOBAL INFRATECH PVT LTD and M/s Brand Kettle Projects Pvt. Ltd.. M/s Om Sai Sagar Traders bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; E-VERVE DESIGN won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.