Competitor profile

E M UMAPATHI, CONTRACTOR

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 28% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

10tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
5 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹78.8 L
of ₹2.8 Cr bid — 28.2% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count10 bids
50.0%
30.0%
20.0%
Awarded550.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected330.0%
Lost220.0%
By value₹2.8 Cr
28.2%
24.7%
47.1%
Awarded₹78.8 L28.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹69.0 L24.7%
Lost₹1.3 Cr47.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Tamil Nadu₹78.8 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
K RAJAGOPAL0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S EXTRUSION ENTERPRISES1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹35.7 L
won head-to-head
03
SATHIYANARAYANA CONSTRUCTIONS2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹38.7 L
won head-to-head
04
Narasimhan Kondapalayam1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
05
C SIVAKUMAR BROTHERS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Selvam0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedE M UMAPATHI, awardedOthers

About E M UMAPATHI, CONTRACTOR

E M UMAPATHI, CONTRACTOR appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹78.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Tamil Nadu Police Housing Corporation, at 77.4% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Tamil Nadu. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against K RAJAGOPAL, M/S EXTRUSION ENTERPRISES and SATHIYANARAYANA CONSTRUCTIONS. K RAJAGOPAL bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; E M UMAPATHI, CONTRACTOR won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.