Competitor profile

M/S DURGAMADHAB CONSTRUCTION AND INTERIOR

They win 9% of what they bid, and 8% of the value they chase.

34tenders on record
8buyer authorities
1state
7 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
32
34 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
28 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.3 Cr
of ₹16.7 Cr bid — 7.6% conversion
Win rate
9.4%
of 32 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count32 bids
87.5%
Awarded39.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected13.1%
Lost2887.5%
By value₹16.7 Cr
87.7%
Awarded₹1.3 Cr7.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹78.7 L4.7%
Lost₹14.6 Cr87.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹1.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S SILICON INTERIORS4 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹2.6 Cr
won head-to-head
02
CHANDAN SAHOO2 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Bimalesh Nayak0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
ALOK KUMAR SAHOO1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹66.7 L
won head-to-head
05
JITENDRA PRASAD BEHERA0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Sandip Kumar Panda0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedDURGAMADHAB awardedOthers

About M/S DURGAMADHAB CONSTRUCTION AND INTERIOR

M/S DURGAMADHAB CONSTRUCTION AND INTERIOR appears as a bidder on 34 government tenders on record, from 8 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 32 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 9.4% win rate — worth ₹1.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Odisha Tourism Devl. Corp., at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S SILICON INTERIORS, CHANDAN SAHOO and Bimalesh Nayak. M/S SILICON INTERIORS bid on 14 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; M/S DURGAMADHAB CONSTRUCTION AND INTERIOR won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.