Competitor profile

DURGABHAVANI GARDEN AND DEVELOPERS

They win 50% of what they bid, and 42% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
19 Jan 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.1 Cr
of ₹2.5 Cr bid — 42.4% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count6 bids
50.0%
33.3%
16.7%
Awarded350.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected233.3%
Lost116.7%
By value₹2.5 Cr
42.3%
54.3%
Awarded₹1.1 Cr42.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.4 Cr54.3%
Lost₹8.5 L3.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

NTPC Limited₹1.1 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Nisarga Ropvatika0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MALLESHI G.CHAVAN1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹81.5 L
won head-to-head
03
Gaded Infratech0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Sri Supreme Engineering0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BALIGAR ASSOCIATES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹7.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedDURGABHAVANI awardedOthers

About DURGABHAVANI GARDEN AND DEVELOPERS

DURGABHAVANI GARDEN AND DEVELOPERS appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹1.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Jan 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is NTPC Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Nisarga Ropvatika, MALLESHI G.CHAVAN and Gaded Infratech. Nisarga Ropvatika bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; DURGABHAVANI GARDEN AND DEVELOPERS won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.