Competitor profile

DURGA Technology Corporation

They win 50% of what they bid, and 60% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
14 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹46.0 L
of ₹77.2 L bid — 59.5% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count6 bids
50.0%
16.7%
33.3%
Awarded350.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected116.7%
Lost233.3%
By value₹77.2 L
59.5%
34.0%
Awarded₹46.0 L59.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.0 L6.5%
Lost₹26.3 L34.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
AMAR EQUIPMENTS PVT LTD0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
AdiChem Technology Pvt. Ltd.0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
NANO TEC2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹22.0 L
won head-to-head
04
Beem Industries0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
TEXCERA ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
J.S.Enterprises1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedDURGA Technology awardedOthers

About DURGA Technology Corporation

DURGA Technology Corporation appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹46.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, at 60.7% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against AMAR EQUIPMENTS PVT LTD, AdiChem Technology Pvt. Ltd. and NANO TEC. AMAR EQUIPMENTS PVT LTD bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; DURGA Technology Corporation won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.