Competitor profile

doon infrastructure

They win 12% of what they bid, but only 0% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

40tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
30 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
34
40 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3,290
of ₹58.6 Cr bid — 0.0% conversion
Win rate
11.8%
of 34 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count34 bids
11.8%
67.6%
20.6%
Awarded411.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected2367.6%
Lost720.6%
By value₹58.6 Cr
52.1%
47.9%
Awarded₹3,2900.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹30.5 Cr52.1%
Lost₹28.1 Cr47.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Ganpati Associates4 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹10.9 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s Surat Singh & Sons3 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹18.6 Cr
won head-to-head
03
tikam singh rana1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹16.9 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Rajendra Singh Kuldeep Singh0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Birendra Singh Bisht2 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹14.9 Cr
won head-to-head
06
Amit Joshi1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹2,279
won head-to-head
Rival awardeddoon infrastructure awardedOthers

About doon infrastructure

doon infrastructure appears as a bidder on 40 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 34 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 11.8% win rate — worth ₹3,290 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chief Coordinator, PMGSY, Uttarkhand, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Ganpati Associates, M/s Surat Singh & Sons and tikam singh rana. M/s Ganpati Associates bid on 19 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; doon infrastructure won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.