Competitor profile

CRESCENT LAB EQUIPMENTS

They win 53% of what they bid, but only 37% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

15tenders on record
7buyer authorities
1state
3 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
15
15 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹45.3 L
of ₹1.2 Cr bid — 36.6% conversion
Win rate
53.3%
of 15 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count15 bids
53.3%
26.7%
20.0%
Awarded853.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected426.7%
Lost320.0%
By value₹1.2 Cr
36.6%
34.6%
28.8%
Awarded₹45.3 L36.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹42.8 L34.6%
Lost₹35.6 L28.8%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Kannur University₹31.4 L69.2%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹45.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ESSAR TECHINS1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹1.3 L
won head-to-head
02
Amity Solutions1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹3.9 L
won head-to-head
03
UNIVERSAL AGENCIES0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
UNIQUE SCIENTIFIC0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Scientific Enterprises1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹22.4 L
won head-to-head
06
₹1.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedCRESCENT LAB awardedOthers

About CRESCENT LAB EQUIPMENTS

CRESCENT LAB EQUIPMENTS appears as a bidder on 15 government tenders on record, from 7 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 15 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 53.3% win rate — worth ₹45.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Kannur University, at 69.2% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against ESSAR TECHINS, Amity Solutions and UNIVERSAL AGENCIES. ESSAR TECHINS bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; CRESCENT LAB EQUIPMENTS won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.