Competitor profile

COTS AND COTS

They win 27% of what they bid, and 26% of the value they chase.

12tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
14 Dec 2021last award
Total bids
11
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹34.9 L
of ₹1.3 Cr bid — 26.4% conversion
Win rate
27.3%
of 11 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count11 bids
27.3%
63.6%
Awarded327.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected19.1%
Lost763.6%
By value₹1.3 Cr
26.4%
14.5%
59.2%
Awarded₹34.9 L26.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹19.1 L14.5%
Lost₹78.3 L59.2%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

NTPC Limited₹28.0 L80.2%

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
CHINDALIA INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS LIMITED2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹34.2 L
won head-to-head
02
JAIN TRADING COMPANY2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹8.6 L
won head-to-head
03
Gemini Power Hydraulics Pvt. Ltd.0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
VANKOS AND COMPANY2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹21.9 L
won head-to-head
05
Spannkraft Hydrosystems Private Limited0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SUN FLUID POWER2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹30.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedCOTS AND COTS awardedOthers

About COTS AND COTS

COTS AND COTS appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 11 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 27.3% win rate — worth ₹34.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Dec 2021.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is NTPC Limited, at 80.2% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 24.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against CHINDALIA INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS LIMITED, JAIN TRADING COMPANY and Gemini Power Hydraulics Pvt. Ltd.. CHINDALIA INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS LIMITED bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; COTS AND COTS won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.