Competitor profile

Consulting Engineer NG

They win 25% of what they bid, but only 4% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

4tenders on record
3buyer authorities
0states
16 Apr 2024last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.4 L
of ₹1.8 Cr bid — 3.5% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
25.0%
75.0%
Awarded125.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost375.0%
By value₹1.8 Cr
96.5%
Awarded₹6.4 L3.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.8 Cr96.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Tea Board India₹6.4 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SAURAV KUMAR1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹85.3 L
won head-to-head
02
RAJ LAXMI SALES AGENCY0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
TECH MECH SERVICES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/s GANPATI TRADERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S A K ENTERPRISE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
MAHABAHU ENTERPRISE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedConsulting awardedOthers

About Consulting Engineer NG

Consulting Engineer NG appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹6.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Apr 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Tea Board India, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 14.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SAURAV KUMAR, RAJ LAXMI SALES AGENCY and TECH MECH SERVICES. SAURAV KUMAR bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Consulting Engineer NG won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.