Competitor profile

M/S CLASSIC TENT HOUSE

They win 50% of what they bid — and 83% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

2tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
22 Jun 2023last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.5 L
of ₹5.5 L bid — 82.8% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹5.5 L
82.8%
17.2%
Awarded₹4.5 L82.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹94,00017.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

HAUDD₹4.5 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
GHULAM HASSAN RATHER1 win · 1 shared tender
₹87,000
won head-to-head
02
Shabir Ahmad Dar0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
REYAZ AHAMD DAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SHAKIR AHMAD BHAT0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Bilal Ahmad Bhat0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
STAR EVENT MANAGEMENT0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedCLASSIC TENT awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to CLASSIC TENT

About M/S CLASSIC TENT HOUSE

M/S CLASSIC TENT HOUSE appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹4.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Jun 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is HAUDD, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against GHULAM HASSAN RATHER, Shabir Ahmad Dar and REYAZ AHAMD DAR. GHULAM HASSAN RATHER bid on 1 of the same tender and won 1 of them; M/S CLASSIC TENT HOUSE won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.