Competitor profile

Chintamani Constructions

They win 3% of what they bid, and 2% of the value they chase.

39tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
20 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
39
39 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
38 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹44.0 L
of ₹21.7 Cr bid — 2.0% conversion
Win rate
2.6%
of 39 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count39 bids
97.4%
Awarded12.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost3897.4%
By value₹21.7 Cr
98.0%
Awarded₹44.0 L2.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹21.2 Cr98.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S.Chourasia Construction Company11 wins · 39 shared tenders
₹5.9 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/S JAI BHAWANI CONSTRUCTIONS24 wins · 39 shared tenders
₹10.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Manoj Jethani0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/s MM TRADERS1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹80.8 L
won head-to-head
05
M/s Dara Constructions, Pulgaon1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹84.3 L
won head-to-head
06
SIBAL AND SIBAL1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹86.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedChintamani awardedOthers

About Chintamani Constructions

Chintamani Constructions appears as a bidder on 39 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 39 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 2.6% win rate — worth ₹44.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 13.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S.Chourasia Construction Company, M/S JAI BHAWANI CONSTRUCTIONS and Manoj Jethani. M/S.Chourasia Construction Company bid on 39 of the same tenders and won 11 of them; Chintamani Constructions won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.