Competitor profile

M/s CHANDU LAL MEENA

They win 76% of what they bid, and 80% of the value they chase.

38tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
1 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
38
38 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
29
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹14.5 Cr
of ₹18.1 Cr bid — 79.9% conversion
Win rate
76.3%
of 38 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count38 bids
76.3%
23.7%
Awarded2976.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost923.7%
By value₹18.1 Cr
79.9%
20.1%
Awarded₹14.5 Cr79.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3.6 Cr20.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹14.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
HARIOM GUPTA CONTRACTOR3 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
02
NANDINI ENTERPRISES0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/s ETI Enterprises2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹92.6 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S UMMED KUMAR MEENA1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹51,111
won head-to-head
05
M/s Lodwal Construction Company0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S Hajari Lal Saini1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹35.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedCHANDU LAL awardedOthers

About M/s CHANDU LAL MEENA

M/s CHANDU LAL MEENA appears as a bidder on 38 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 38 decided bids, it was awarded 29 — a 76.3% win rate — worth ₹14.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PHED-Chief Engineer(HQ),Jaipur, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against HARIOM GUPTA CONTRACTOR, NANDINI ENTERPRISES and M/s ETI Enterprises. HARIOM GUPTA CONTRACTOR bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; M/s CHANDU LAL MEENA won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.