Competitor profile

CHAITRAPALI ENGINEERS

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 8% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
26 Mar 2022last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.5 L
of ₹72.9 L bid — 7.5% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹72.9 L
92.5%
Awarded₹5.5 L7.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹67.4 L92.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Ms Star Enterprises2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹60.9 L
won head-to-head
02
OM POWER SYSTEMS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
zen enterprises0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Kyros Engine Solutions Private Limited0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
RST CONTROL SYSTEM0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
VALORES CONSULTING ENGINEERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedCHAITRAPALI awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to CHAITRAPALI

About CHAITRAPALI ENGINEERS

CHAITRAPALI ENGINEERS appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹5.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Mar 2022.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd., at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Ms Star Enterprises, OM POWER SYSTEMS and zen enterprises. Ms Star Enterprises bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; CHAITRAPALI ENGINEERS won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.