Competitor profile

CATT CONSTRUCTIONS

They win 50% of what they bid, and 52% of the value they chase.

16tenders on record
8buyer authorities
1state
18 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
16
16 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.0 Cr
of ₹3.9 Cr bid — 52.1% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count16 bids
50.0%
43.8%
Awarded850.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected16.3%
Lost743.8%
By value₹3.9 Cr
52.1%
12.0%
36.0%
Awarded₹2.0 Cr52.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹46.8 L12.0%
Lost₹1.4 Cr36.0%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹69.6 L34.1%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹2.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ANISH MATHEW0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
RINIL JAMES GEORGE0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
PAUL K VINCENT1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹31.0 L
won head-to-head
04
jibin joseph0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
AFKAR T ABDUL RAHIMAN0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SABU SEBASTIAN0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedCATT CONSTRUCTIONS awardedOthers

About CATT CONSTRUCTIONS

CATT CONSTRUCTIONS appears as a bidder on 16 government tenders on record, from 8 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹2.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Mahatma Gandhi University, at 36.2% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against ANISH MATHEW, RINIL JAMES GEORGE and PAUL K VINCENT. ANISH MATHEW bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; CATT CONSTRUCTIONS won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.