Competitor profile

bijaya kumar senapati

They win 11% of what they bid, and 15% of the value they chase.

102tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
4 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
102
102 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
11
86 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.4 Cr
of ₹16.2 Cr bid — 14.7% conversion
Win rate
10.8%
of 102 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count102 bids
10.8%
84.3%
Awarded1110.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected54.9%
Lost8684.3%
By value₹16.2 Cr
14.7%
78.3%
Awarded₹2.4 Cr14.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.1 Cr7.0%
Lost₹12.6 Cr78.3%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

EIC-CIVIL₹2.2 Cr93.7%
CE RW I₹4.3 L1.8%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹2.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SUVAM PARIDA0 wins · 39 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Rajesh Kumar Das4 wins · 32 shared tenders
₹38.9 L
won head-to-head
04
SANGRAM SAMAL2 wins · 30 shared tenders
₹26.4 L
won head-to-head
05
MIR AETSAM UL HAQ1 win · 29 shared tenders
₹14.4 L
won head-to-head
06
jagannath sahoo0 wins · 26 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedbijaya kumar awardedOthers

About bijaya kumar senapati

bijaya kumar senapati appears as a bidder on 102 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 102 decided bids, it was awarded 11 — a 10.8% win rate — worth ₹2.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is EIC-CIVIL, at 93.7% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SUVAM PARIDA, PAYAL CONSTRUCTION PROP. SMT PRAMODINI ROUT and Rajesh Kumar Das. SUVAM PARIDA bid on 39 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; bijaya kumar senapati won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.