Competitor profile

Bharat Construction

They win 6% of what they bid, and 2% of the value they chase.

19tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
21 May 2025last award
Total bids
18
19 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.3 Cr
of ₹59.0 Cr bid — 2.2% conversion
Win rate
5.6%
of 18 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count18 bids
50.0%
44.4%
Awarded15.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected950.0%
Lost844.4%
By value₹59.0 Cr
44.1%
53.7%
Awarded₹1.3 Cr2.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹26.0 Cr44.1%
Lost₹31.7 Cr53.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

MD- UJVN₹1.3 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹1.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Kamil Hasan0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
universal contraction0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Garware Technical Fibres Ltd2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹8.6 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/s Royal Construction1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹2.9 Cr
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹8.2 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedBharat Construction awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Bharat Construction

About Bharat Construction

Bharat Construction appears as a bidder on 19 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 18 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 5.6% win rate — worth ₹1.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 May 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD- UJVN, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Kamil Hasan, universal contraction and Garware Technical Fibres Ltd. Kamil Hasan bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Bharat Construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.