Competitor profile

Babul Sarma

They win 38% of what they bid, but only 20% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

8tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
26 Aug 2022last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹17.0 L
of ₹83.9 L bid — 20.2% conversion
Win rate
37.5%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count8 bids
37.5%
62.5%
Awarded337.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost562.5%
By value₹83.9 L
20.2%
79.8%
Awarded₹17.0 L20.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹66.9 L79.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Tripura₹17.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Badal Chakraborty0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Goutam Kar2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹19.4 L
won head-to-head
03
Satyajit Dey2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹717
won head-to-head
04
Paritosh Roy Karmakar1 win · 1 shared tender
₹317
won head-to-head
05
SANKAR PAL0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Subhendu Saha1 win · 1 shared tender
₹22.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedBabul Sarma awardedOthers

About Babul Sarma

Babul Sarma appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 37.5% win rate — worth ₹17.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Aug 2022.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chief Engineer, Rural Development Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Tripura. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Badal Chakraborty, Goutam Kar and Satyajit Dey. Badal Chakraborty bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Babul Sarma won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.