Competitor profile

AVM CONSTRUCTION

They win 16% of what they bid, and 14% of the value they chase.

33tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
21 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
32
33 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
27 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.7 Cr
of ₹12.6 Cr bid — 13.7% conversion
Win rate
15.6%
of 32 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count32 bids
15.6%
84.4%
Awarded515.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost2784.4%
By value₹12.6 Cr
13.7%
86.3%
Awarded₹1.7 Cr13.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹10.8 Cr86.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

5 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S AARJAY ASSOCIATES2 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹74.6 L
won head-to-head
02
Kuriako Mathai and company4 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
03
ZOOM ENTERPRISES1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹42.6 L
won head-to-head
04
₹28.8 L
won head-to-head
05
Sreema Enterprises0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ELSOL ENGINEERS1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹29.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAVM CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About AVM CONSTRUCTION

AVM CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 33 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 32 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 15.6% win rate — worth ₹1.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 10.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S AARJAY ASSOCIATES, Kuriako Mathai and company and ZOOM ENTERPRISES. M/S AARJAY ASSOCIATES bid on 21 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; AVM CONSTRUCTION won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.