Competitor profile

ATUL ENTERPRISES

They win 30% of what they bid, and 26% of the value they chase.

162tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
23 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
159
162 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
48
109 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹15.4 Cr
of ₹59.3 Cr bid — 25.9% conversion
Win rate
30.2%
of 159 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count159 bids
30.2%
68.6%
Awarded4830.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected21.3%
Lost10968.6%
By value₹59.3 Cr
25.9%
71.4%
Awarded₹15.4 Cr25.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.6 Cr2.6%
Lost₹42.3 Cr71.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

48 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
harshraj and co6 wins · 65 shared tenders
₹96.9 L
won head-to-head
02
SAI RUPA CONSTRUCTIONS7 wins · 63 shared tenders
₹2.9 Cr
won head-to-head
03
BEEGEE DESIGN SYSTEMS4 wins · 60 shared tenders
₹1.7 Cr
won head-to-head
04
VACON INFRASTRUCTURES3 wins · 58 shared tenders
₹1.0 Cr
won head-to-head
05
PARDEEP AND CO2 wins · 52 shared tenders
₹83.8 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S DIVIJA BUILDERS2 wins · 45 shared tenders
₹89.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedATUL ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About ATUL ENTERPRISES

ATUL ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 162 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 159 decided bids, it was awarded 48 — a 30.2% win rate — worth ₹15.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against harshraj and co, SAI RUPA CONSTRUCTIONS and BEEGEE DESIGN SYSTEMS. harshraj and co bid on 65 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; ATUL ENTERPRISES won 22.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.