Competitor profile

ASCENT STRUCTURAL SOLUTIONS LLP

They win 43% of what they bid, and 47% of the value they chase.

7tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
3 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹64.5 L
of ₹1.4 Cr bid — 46.8% conversion
Win rate
42.9%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count7 bids
42.9%
42.9%
14.3%
Awarded342.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected342.9%
Lost114.3%
By value₹1.4 Cr
46.8%
42.2%
11.0%
Awarded₹64.5 L46.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹58.1 L42.2%
Lost₹15.1 L11.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹64.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Ratheesh kumar0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
AZIN METALS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MUNEER E1 win · 1 shared tender
₹14.3 L
won head-to-head
04
shigan kalankoli1 win · 1 shared tender
₹7.0 L
won head-to-head
05
JAYARAJAN K1 win · 1 shared tender
₹24.6 L
won head-to-head
06
Brijesh. C0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedASCENT STRUCTURAL awardedOthers

About ASCENT STRUCTURAL SOLUTIONS LLP

ASCENT STRUCTURAL SOLUTIONS LLP appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 42.9% win rate — worth ₹64.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Harbour Engineering Department, at 83.5% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Ratheesh kumar, AZIN METALS and MUNEER E. Ratheesh kumar bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; ASCENT STRUCTURAL SOLUTIONS LLP won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.