Competitor profile

Arnav Enterprises

They win 35% of what they bid, and 38% of the value they chase.

20tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
31 Oct 2025last award
Total bids
20
20 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹37.7 Cr
of ₹99.9 Cr bid — 37.8% conversion
Win rate
35.0%
of 20 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count20 bids
35.0%
15.0%
50.0%
Awarded735.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected315.0%
Lost1050.0%
By value₹99.9 Cr
37.7%
10.3%
52.0%
Awarded₹37.7 Cr37.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.2 Cr10.3%
Lost₹52.0 Cr52.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

7 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
OM PRAKASH KALIA7 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹28.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
HARGOVIND PURVIYA1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹3.2 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/S RAISINGH AND COMPANY2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹12.2 Cr
won head-to-head
04
AFCONS INFRA0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Ms Mithlesh Parashar0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
w a construction company0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedArnav Enterprises awardedOthers

About Arnav Enterprises

Arnav Enterprises appears as a bidder on 20 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 20 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 35.0% win rate — worth ₹37.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 31 Oct 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against OM PRAKASH KALIA, HARGOVIND PURVIYA and M/S RAISINGH AND COMPANY. OM PRAKASH KALIA bid on 14 of the same tenders and won 7 of them; Arnav Enterprises won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.