Competitor profile

ARIHANT TRADING

They win 81% of what they bid, and 76% of the value they chase.

16tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
22 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
16
16 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
13
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.4 Cr
of ₹3.1 Cr bid — 76.5% conversion
Win rate
81.3%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count16 bids
81.3%
18.8%
Awarded1381.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost318.8%
By value₹3.1 Cr
76.5%
23.5%
Awarded₹2.4 Cr76.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹73.7 L23.5%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
TAJ CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNICATION2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹28.3 L
won head-to-head
02
MAA NARMADA CONSTRUCTION WORK0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
C M CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
YADAV TRADERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SV CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ASLAM BUILDERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedARIHANT TRADING awardedOthers

About ARIHANT TRADING

ARIHANT TRADING appears as a bidder on 16 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 13 — a 81.3% win rate — worth ₹2.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 89.7% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against TAJ CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNICATION, MAA NARMADA CONSTRUCTION WORK and C M CONSTRUCTION. TAJ CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNICATION bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; ARIHANT TRADING won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.