Competitor profile

ARIHANT METALS

They win 40% of what they bid — and 55% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

17tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
17 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
15
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.1 Cr
of ₹7.4 Cr bid — 55.3% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 15 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count15 bids
40.0%
53.3%
Awarded640.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected16.7%
Lost853.3%
By value₹7.4 Cr
55.3%
44.6%
Awarded₹4.1 Cr55.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.3 Cr44.6%
Lost₹13,3550.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

MP Forest Department₹4.1 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KESHAV INDUSTRIES6 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹4.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
PRAKHAR ENTERPRISES5 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹4.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
MAURYA WIRE NETTING WORKS1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
04
AMAN ENTERPRISES4 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹2.4 Cr
won head-to-head
05
QUALITY ENTERPRISES3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹5,462
won head-to-head
06
Mahalaxmi Enterprises1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹273
won head-to-head
Rival awardedARIHANT METALS awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to ARIHANT METALS

About ARIHANT METALS

ARIHANT METALS appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 15 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹4.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MP Forest Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against KESHAV INDUSTRIES, PRAKHAR ENTERPRISES and MAURYA WIRE NETTING WORKS. KESHAV INDUSTRIES bid on 11 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; ARIHANT METALS won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.