Competitor profile

ANUPAMA CONSTRUCTIONS

They win 29% of what they bid, but only 0% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

9tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
14 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
7
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹200
of ₹45.4 L bid — 0.0% conversion
Win rate
28.6%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
28.6%
14.3%
57.1%
Awarded228.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected114.3%
Lost457.1%
By value₹45.4 L
99.5%
Awarded₹2000.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹20,3380.4%
Lost₹45.2 L99.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

IndianOil₹200100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MAA CONSTRUCTIONS4 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹23.0 L
won head-to-head
02
PADMAJA CONSULTANT AND CONTRACTORS2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹200
won head-to-head
03
SRI SAI MANIKANTA ENTERPRISES3 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹466
won head-to-head
04
Lakshmi Constructions2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹200
won head-to-head
05
VIKAS ENGINEERING COMPANY3 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹201
won head-to-head
06
AMAN ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS3 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹710
won head-to-head
Rival awardedANUPAMA CONSTRUCTIONS awardedOthers

About ANUPAMA CONSTRUCTIONS

ANUPAMA CONSTRUCTIONS appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 28.6% win rate — worth ₹200 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is IndianOil, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MAA CONSTRUCTIONS, PADMAJA CONSULTANT AND CONTRACTORS and SRI SAI MANIKANTA ENTERPRISES. MAA CONSTRUCTIONS bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; ANUPAMA CONSTRUCTIONS won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.