Competitor profile

M/S ANUPAMA CONSTRUCTION

They win 40% of what they bid — and 68% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

15tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
2 May 2026last award
Total bids
15
15 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.8 Cr
of ₹4.2 Cr bid — 67.7% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 15 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count15 bids
40.0%
53.3%
Awarded640.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected16.7%
Lost853.3%
By value₹4.2 Cr
67.7%
28.7%
Awarded₹2.8 Cr67.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹14.8 L3.6%
Lost₹1.2 Cr28.7%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zila Parishad Ramgarh₹1.9 Cr66.9%
UDD Secretary₹93.3 L33.1%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹2.8 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
BABLU KUMAR MODI3 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹42.1 L
won head-to-head
02
Raj Construction0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S SAMAR ENTERPRISES1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹9.5 L
won head-to-head
04
OM ENTERPRISES1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹14.8 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S BRIGHT CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
RISHAV KUMAR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedANUPAMA CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About M/S ANUPAMA CONSTRUCTION

M/S ANUPAMA CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 15 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 15 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹2.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Zila Parishad Ramgarh, at 66.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against BABLU KUMAR MODI, Raj Construction and M/S SAMAR ENTERPRISES. BABLU KUMAR MODI bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; M/S ANUPAMA CONSTRUCTION won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.