Competitor profile

M/S ANUPAM KUMAR

They win 53% of what they bid, and 56% of the value they chase.

15tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
8 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
15
15 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.9 Cr
of ₹7.1 Cr bid — 55.5% conversion
Win rate
53.3%
of 15 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count15 bids
53.3%
33.3%
13.3%
Awarded853.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected533.3%
Lost213.3%
By value₹7.1 Cr
55.5%
14.5%
29.9%
Awarded₹3.9 Cr55.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.0 Cr14.5%
Lost₹2.1 Cr29.9%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RWD EinC₹1.9 Cr48.8%
UDD Secretary₹1.8 Cr45.6%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹3.9 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KATYAYANI BUILDICON3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹72.8 L
won head-to-head
02
₹0
won head-to-head
03
ABHISHEK ENTERPRISES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S DEEP SHAKTI CONSTRUCTION1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹21.5 L
won head-to-head
05
ROHIT CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Saptsatee Construction0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedANUPAM KUMAR awardedOthers

About M/S ANUPAM KUMAR

M/S ANUPAM KUMAR appears as a bidder on 15 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 15 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 53.3% win rate — worth ₹3.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RWD EinC, at 48.8% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against KATYAYANI BUILDICON, M/S PARMA NAND SINGH BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED and ABHISHEK ENTERPRISES. KATYAYANI BUILDICON bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; M/S ANUPAM KUMAR won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.