Competitor profile

Anil Kapahi-M/S Anil Kumar

They win 33% of what they bid — and 47% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

3tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
25 Sept 2013last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹88.7 L
of ₹1.9 Cr bid — 46.7% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹1.9 Cr
46.7%
53.3%
Awarded₹88.7 L46.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.0 Cr53.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

University Department₹88.7 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Suresh Kumar-Karam Chand1 win · 1 shared tender
₹44.0 L
won head-to-head
02
Sumit Gupta-Sumit Gupta1 win · 1 shared tender
₹50.9 L
won head-to-head
03
Jasjeet Singh-Khalsa Gymnastic Works0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
narinder singh jamwal0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAnil Kapahi-M/S awardedOthers

About Anil Kapahi-M/S Anil Kumar

Anil Kapahi-M/S Anil Kumar appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹88.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Sept 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is University Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Suresh Kumar-Karam Chand, Sumit Gupta-Sumit Gupta and Jasjeet Singh-Khalsa Gymnastic Works. Suresh Kumar-Karam Chand bid on 1 of the same tender and won 1 of them; Anil Kapahi-M/S Anil Kumar won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.