Competitor profile

AMRIT LAL

They win 25% of what they bid — and 49% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

4tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
15 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹30.2 L
of ₹62.2 L bid — 48.5% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
25.0%
75.0%
Awarded125.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost375.0%
By value₹62.2 L
48.5%
51.5%
Awarded₹30.2 L48.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹32.0 L51.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

MP State Coperative Marketing Federation Ltd.₹30.2 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Madhya Pradesh₹30.2 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SAHAJ BUILDCON0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
FALOUDI ENTERPRISES2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹5.2 L
won head-to-head
03
P S CONSTRUCTION FATEHPUR FUTIYA1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹26.3 L
won head-to-head
04
SARTHI GROUP0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SHIV NARAYAN DANGI0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
CHOUHAN CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAMRIT LAL awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to AMRIT LAL

About AMRIT LAL

AMRIT LAL appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹30.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MP State Coperative Marketing Federation Ltd., at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SAHAJ BUILDCON, FALOUDI ENTERPRISES and P S CONSTRUCTION FATEHPUR FUTIYA. SAHAJ BUILDCON bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; AMRIT LAL won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.