Competitor profile

Amrit Engineering

They win 7% of what they bid, and 2% of the value they chase.

15tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
9 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
15
15 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
14 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹11.1 L
of ₹5.2 Cr bid — 2.1% conversion
Win rate
6.7%
of 15 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count15 bids
93.3%
Awarded16.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1493.3%
By value₹5.2 Cr
97.8%
Awarded₹11.1 L2.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹5.1 Cr97.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Sharma Enterprises2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹27.4 L
won head-to-head
02
AGRAWAL CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹40.9 L
won head-to-head
03
SILPIN ARCHITECT ANDASSOCIATES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
RPSM Global Private Limited0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
ATUL LIKHI0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Durga Construction1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹15.3 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAmrit Engineering awardedOthers

About Amrit Engineering

Amrit Engineering appears as a bidder on 15 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 15 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 6.7% win rate — worth ₹11.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 9 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Engineer-in-Chief - Water Resources Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 12.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Sharma Enterprises, AGRAWAL CONSTRUCTION and SILPIN ARCHITECT ANDASSOCIATES. Sharma Enterprises bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; Amrit Engineering won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.