Competitor profile

AMRISH PURI

They win 46% of what they bid, and 38% of the value they chase.

13tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
5 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
13
13 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹31.0 L
of ₹80.9 L bid — 38.3% conversion
Win rate
46.1%
of 13 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count13 bids
46.2%
46.2%
Awarded646.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected17.7%
Lost646.2%
By value₹80.9 L
38.3%
56.1%
Awarded₹31.0 L38.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.5 L5.5%
Lost₹45.4 L56.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹29.0 L93.6%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
satya paul thakur govt cont0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
RAFTAR SINGH THAKUR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Inder Paul0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Sandeep Kumar0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SANJEEV KUMAR GOVT CONT1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹11.8 L
won head-to-head
06
surender kumar govt cont2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹20.3 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAMRISH PURI awardedOthers

About AMRISH PURI

AMRISH PURI appears as a bidder on 13 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 13 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 46.1% win rate — worth ₹31.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 93.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Himachal Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against satya paul thakur govt cont, RAFTAR SINGH THAKUR and Inder Paul. satya paul thakur govt cont bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; AMRISH PURI won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.