Competitor profile

M/S AMOL BAPUSAHEB MOTE

They win 40% of what they bid, and 35% of the value they chase.

12tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
28 Mar 2026last award
Total bids
10
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.2 Cr
of ₹3.4 Cr bid — 35.0% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count10 bids
40.0%
60.0%
Awarded440.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost660.0%
By value₹3.4 Cr
35.0%
65.0%
Awarded₹1.2 Cr35.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.2 Cr65.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Shiv Projects1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹31.0 L
won head-to-head
02
ASC CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
shree nathji trading corporation1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹38.9 L
won head-to-head
04
Chanda Construction Co.1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹42.3 L
won head-to-head
05
BEYLIM INFRA0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S TANUSHREE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAMOL BAPUSAHEB awardedOthers

About M/S AMOL BAPUSAHEB MOTE

M/S AMOL BAPUSAHEB MOTE appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹1.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Mar 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Shiv Projects, ASC CONSTRUCTION and shree nathji trading corporation. Shiv Projects bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S AMOL BAPUSAHEB MOTE won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.