Competitor profile

AMIT TRADING & MILLING

They win 17% of what they bid — and 49% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

6tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
17 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹43.2 L
of ₹87.8 L bid — 49.2% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
83.3%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost583.3%
By value₹87.8 L
49.2%
50.8%
Awarded₹43.2 L49.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹44.6 L50.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Directorate Urban Administration and Development₹43.2 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Madhya Pradesh₹43.2 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
S N CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
R R CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹27.6 L
won head-to-head
03
ARUN CHAKRAWARTY1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹4.4 L
won head-to-head
04
ASHUTOSH TRADING AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
RAJNEESH AND COMPANY0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SHREYA CONSTRUCTION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAMIT TRADING awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to AMIT TRADING

About AMIT TRADING & MILLING

AMIT TRADING & MILLING appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹43.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Urban Administration and Development, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against S N CONSTRUCTION, R R CONSTRUCTION and ARUN CHAKRAWARTY. S N CONSTRUCTION bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; AMIT TRADING & MILLING won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.