Competitor profile

AMIT TRADERS

They win 12% of what they bid, and 10% of the value they chase.

100tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
21 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
91
100 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
11
64 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.1 Cr
of ₹29.5 Cr bid — 10.5% conversion
Win rate
12.1%
of 91 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count91 bids
12.1%
17.6%
70.3%
Awarded1112.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1617.6%
Lost6470.3%
By value₹29.5 Cr
10.5%
16.0%
73.5%
Awarded₹3.1 Cr10.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.7 Cr16.0%
Lost₹21.7 Cr73.5%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

11 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
J.B ASSOCIATES10 wins · 33 shared tenders
₹3.9 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/S PUNDIR BUILDERS2 wins · 24 shared tenders
₹59.7 L
won head-to-head
03
S.B TRADING COMPANY7 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹2.8 Cr
won head-to-head
04
JSB CONSTRUCTION3 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/s RK ENTERPRISES0 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ACE BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹20.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAMIT TRADERS awardedOthers

About AMIT TRADERS

AMIT TRADERS appears as a bidder on 100 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 91 decided bids, it was awarded 11 — a 12.1% win rate — worth ₹3.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 53.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 10.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against J.B ASSOCIATES, M/S PUNDIR BUILDERS and S.B TRADING COMPANY. J.B ASSOCIATES bid on 33 of the same tenders and won 10 of them; AMIT TRADERS won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.