Competitor profile

AMIT KUMAR THAPA

They win 50% of what they bid, and 49% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
28 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹65.0 L
of ₹1.3 Cr bid — 49.4% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded350.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost350.0%
By value₹1.3 Cr
49.4%
50.6%
Awarded₹65.0 L49.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹66.7 L50.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹65.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KARMA BANTAWA0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SANTOSH TAMANG0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
DIPENDRA CHETTRI0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
GABAC AND COMPAY0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Dipesh Rai0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
HIMALAYAN BUILDERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAMIT KUMAR awardedOthers

About AMIT KUMAR THAPA

AMIT KUMAR THAPA appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹65.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is GORKHALAND TERRITORIAL ADMINISTRATION, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against KARMA BANTAWA, SANTOSH TAMANG and DIPENDRA CHETTRI. KARMA BANTAWA bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; AMIT KUMAR THAPA won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.