Competitor profile

AMIT ENTERPRISES

They win 24% of what they bid, and 18% of the value they chase.

113tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
25 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
103
113 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
25
58 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.3 Cr
of ₹30.1 Cr bid — 17.7% conversion
Win rate
24.3%
of 103 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count103 bids
24.3%
19.4%
56.3%
Awarded2524.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected2019.4%
Lost5856.3%
By value₹30.1 Cr
17.7%
25.7%
56.6%
Awarded₹5.3 Cr17.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹7.7 Cr25.7%
Lost₹17.1 Cr56.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

25 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
B.R. Enterprises1 win · 29 shared tenders
₹29.5 L
won head-to-head
02
M P TYAGI ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS7 wins · 28 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
03
PRASAD ELECTRICALS2 wins · 25 shared tenders
₹45.4 L
won head-to-head
04
Rahul Enterprises0 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SALUJA CONSTRUCTION CO2 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹43.0 L
won head-to-head
06
Deven Associates1 win · 16 shared tenders
₹32.5 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAMIT ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About AMIT ENTERPRISES

AMIT ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 113 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 103 decided bids, it was awarded 25 — a 24.3% win rate — worth ₹5.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 8.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against B.R. Enterprises, M P TYAGI ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS and PRASAD ELECTRICALS. B.R. Enterprises bid on 29 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; AMIT ENTERPRISES won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.