Competitor profile

AMIT ENTERPRISES

They win 40% of what they bid, but only 28% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

10tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
23 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹7.2 L
of ₹25.5 L bid — 28.2% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count10 bids
40.0%
20.0%
40.0%
Awarded440.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected220.0%
Lost440.0%
By value₹25.5 L
28.2%
71.7%
Awarded₹7.2 L28.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹18.3 L71.7%
Lost₹2,8140.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

MP Forest Department₹7.2 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHARDA WIRE & STEEL PRODUCTS2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹418
won head-to-head
02
KESHAV INDUSTRIES0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MAURYA WIRE NETTING WORKS0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SHARDA CEMENT PIPES AND STEEL PRODUCTS0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
PCL TRADERS1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹1,500
won head-to-head
06
SHARDA BARBED WIRE INDUSTRIES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAMIT ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About AMIT ENTERPRISES

AMIT ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹7.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MP Forest Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHARDA WIRE & STEEL PRODUCTS, KESHAV INDUSTRIES and MAURYA WIRE NETTING WORKS. SHARDA WIRE & STEEL PRODUCTS bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; AMIT ENTERPRISES won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.