Competitor profile

M/s. Amit Const. Co.

They win 40% of what they bid, and 36% of the value they chase.

47tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
24 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
47
47 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
19
27 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹74.5 L
of ₹2.1 Cr bid — 35.9% conversion
Win rate
40.4%
of 47 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count47 bids
40.4%
57.4%
Awarded1940.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected12.1%
Lost2757.4%
By value₹2.1 Cr
35.9%
64.1%
Awarded₹74.5 L35.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.0%
Lost₹1.3 Cr64.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

19 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s. Ajay & Co.5 wins · 29 shared tenders
₹17.0 L
won head-to-head
02
GAURAV Gupta13 wins · 23 shared tenders
₹43.6 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S. MATHUR CONST. CO.0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Javed khan1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹4.1 L
won head-to-head
05
BARAHI CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
RAJESH GUPTA1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹6.5 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAmit Const. awardedOthers

About M/s. Amit Const. Co.

M/s. Amit Const. Co. appears as a bidder on 47 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 47 decided bids, it was awarded 19 — a 40.4% win rate — worth ₹74.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Municipal Corporation of Delhi, at 87.1% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s. Ajay & Co., GAURAV Gupta and M/S. MATHUR CONST. CO.. M/s. Ajay & Co. bid on 29 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; M/s. Amit Const. Co. won 9.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.