Competitor profile

M/s Amar Const. Co. -I

They win 16% of what they bid, and 22% of the value they chase.

77tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
27 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
77
77 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
12
61 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹18.6 Cr
of ₹83.5 Cr bid — 22.3% conversion
Win rate
15.6%
of 77 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count77 bids
15.6%
79.2%
Awarded1215.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected45.2%
Lost6179.2%
By value₹83.5 Cr
22.3%
10.6%
67.0%
Awarded₹18.6 Cr22.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹8.9 Cr10.6%
Lost₹56.0 Cr67.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

12 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAVI GUPTA6 wins · 29 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/S GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION1 win · 21 shared tenders
₹46.0 L
won head-to-head
03
Puneet Construction Co0 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
RANA ENTERPRISES1 win · 16 shared tenders
₹10.0 L
won head-to-head
05
S.N Malhotra and Sons4 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹10.7 Cr
won head-to-head
06
MUKESH JORWAL0 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAmar Const. awardedOthers

About M/s Amar Const. Co. -I

M/s Amar Const. Co. -I appears as a bidder on 77 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 77 decided bids, it was awarded 12 — a 15.6% win rate — worth ₹18.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 27 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Municipal Corporation of Delhi, at 67.0% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 29.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RAVI GUPTA, M/S GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION and Puneet Construction Co. RAVI GUPTA bid on 29 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; M/s Amar Const. Co. -I won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.