Competitor profile

Amar associates

They win 8% of what they bid, and 1% of the value they chase.

50tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
25 May 2026last award
Total bids
49
50 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
44 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹79.3 L
of ₹116.5 Cr bid — 0.7% conversion
Win rate
8.2%
of 49 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count49 bids
89.8%
Awarded48.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected12.0%
Lost4489.8%
By value₹116.5 Cr
71.9%
27.4%
Awarded₹79.3 L0.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹83.8 Cr71.9%
Lost₹31.9 Cr27.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

IndianOil₹79.3 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
S Thartius Engineering Contractors2 wins · 47 shared tenders
₹1
won head-to-head
02
SRI VINAYAGA ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS2 wins · 46 shared tenders
₹1
won head-to-head
03
M HARI VITTAL3 wins · 44 shared tenders
₹85.3 L
won head-to-head
04
MAHA CONSTRUCTIONS3 wins · 38 shared tenders
₹200
won head-to-head
05
KKS ENGINEERS2 wins · 37 shared tenders
₹1
won head-to-head
06
venkata satya constructions2 wins · 37 shared tenders
₹1
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAmar associates awardedOthers

About Amar associates

Amar associates appears as a bidder on 50 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 49 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 8.2% win rate — worth ₹79.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 25 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is IndianOil, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against S Thartius Engineering Contractors, SRI VINAYAGA ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS and M HARI VITTAL. S Thartius Engineering Contractors bid on 47 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; Amar associates won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.