Competitor profile

AMAL KUMAR JANA

They win 13% of what they bid, and 20% of the value they chase.

8tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
17 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹20.7 L
of ₹1.0 Cr bid — 20.5% conversion
Win rate
12.5%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count8 bids
12.5%
87.5%
Awarded112.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost787.5%
By value₹1.0 Cr
20.5%
79.5%
Awarded₹20.7 L20.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹80.5 L79.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Ramanand Singh4 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹48.2 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S B.K Traders1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹16.7 L
won head-to-head
03
SHARMA TRADERS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹8.5 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S SIMA ENTERPRISE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S VISHWAKARMA ENTERPRISE1 win · 1 shared tender
₹4.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAMAL KUMAR awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to AMAL KUMAR

About AMAL KUMAR JANA

AMAL KUMAR JANA appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 12.5% win rate — worth ₹20.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Eastern Coalfields Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Ramanand Singh, M/S B.K Traders and SHARMA TRADERS. M/s Ramanand Singh bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; AMAL KUMAR JANA won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.