Competitor profile

m/s alif construction

They win 50% of what they bid, and 52% of the value they chase.

2tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
3 Jan 2018last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.0 Cr
of ₹2.0 Cr bid — 52.0% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹2.0 Cr
52.0%
48.0%
Awarded₹1.0 Cr52.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹96.4 L48.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RIICO-Sr. DGM(Tech)₹1.0 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹1.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Nagin Lal Patel0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
GBNR Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Nalwaya Constructions0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S S D RAWAL0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
RAMCHANDRA GUPTA AND CO.0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BNRJ BUILD GROUP UDAIPUR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedalif construction awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to alif construction

About m/s alif construction

m/s alif construction appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹1.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Jan 2018.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RIICO-Sr. DGM(Tech), at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Nagin Lal Patel, GBNR Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd and Nalwaya Constructions. Nagin Lal Patel bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; m/s alif construction won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.