Competitor profile

ALI P M

They win 33% of what they bid, but only 2% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

12tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
12
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹28.7 L
of ₹11.6 Cr bid — 2.5% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 12 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count12 bids
33.3%
33.3%
33.3%
Awarded433.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected433.3%
Lost433.3%
By value₹11.6 Cr
48.0%
49.5%
Awarded₹28.7 L2.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.6 Cr48.0%
Lost₹5.7 Cr49.5%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹28.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Muhammed4 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹5.6 Cr
won head-to-head
02
MUHAMMED RIYAS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
BABU K S1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.9 Cr
won head-to-head
04
ALEN JOSE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
JOBY GEORGE0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
CATT CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedALI P M awardedOthers

About ALI P M

ALI P M appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 12 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹28.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Local Self Government Department, at 59.3% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Muhammed, MUHAMMED RIYAS and BABU K S. Muhammed bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; ALI P M won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.