Competitor profile

AJIT KUMAR SENAPATI

They win 4% of what they bid, and 4% of the value they chase.

53tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
27 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
53
53 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
51 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹19.5 L
of ₹5.0 Cr bid — 3.9% conversion
Win rate
3.8%
of 53 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count53 bids
96.2%
Awarded23.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost5196.2%
By value₹5.0 Cr
96.1%
Awarded₹19.5 L3.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹4.8 Cr96.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

EIC-CIVIL₹16.6 L85.3%
CE RW I₹2.9 L14.7%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹19.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
TIRUPATI PRASAD PANIGRAHI3 wins · 40 shared tenders
₹39.4 L
won head-to-head
02
NANDA KISHOR PRASAD CHOURASIA1 win · 39 shared tenders
₹14.4 L
won head-to-head
03
RAINA KADRAKA0 wins · 38 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SHYAM KUMAR DASH0 wins · 35 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SANGRAM KESHAR PATNAIK2 wins · 34 shared tenders
₹18.0 L
won head-to-head
06
GUNTAMUKALA GOWRI SANKAR RAO2 wins · 26 shared tenders
₹25.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAJIT KUMAR awardedOthers

About AJIT KUMAR SENAPATI

AJIT KUMAR SENAPATI appears as a bidder on 53 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 53 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 3.8% win rate — worth ₹19.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 27 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is EIC-CIVIL, at 85.3% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against TIRUPATI PRASAD PANIGRAHI, NANDA KISHOR PRASAD CHOURASIA and RAINA KADRAKA. TIRUPATI PRASAD PANIGRAHI bid on 40 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; AJIT KUMAR SENAPATI won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.