Competitor profile

M/S AHUJA TRADING

They win 17% of what they bid, and 10% of the value they chase.

40tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
24 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
35
40 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
19 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.6 Cr
of ₹34.0 Cr bid — 10.5% conversion
Win rate
17.1%
of 35 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count35 bids
17.1%
28.6%
54.3%
Awarded617.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1028.6%
Lost1954.3%
By value₹34.0 Cr
10.5%
55.2%
34.3%
Awarded₹3.6 Cr10.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹18.8 Cr55.2%
Lost₹11.7 Cr34.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

6 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S R. K. INDUSTRIES2 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹3.9 Cr
won head-to-head
02
NEO BUILDERS2 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹2.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
SHRI S K BHATTACHARJEE2 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹1.9 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S G D CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹2.4 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S JANATA CONSTRUCTION1 win · 12 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/S GURUNG CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹93.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAHUJA TRADING awardedOthers

About M/S AHUJA TRADING

M/S AHUJA TRADING appears as a bidder on 40 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 35 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 17.1% win rate — worth ₹3.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S R. K. INDUSTRIES, NEO BUILDERS and SHRI S K BHATTACHARJEE. M/S R. K. INDUSTRIES bid on 17 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M/S AHUJA TRADING won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.