Competitor profile

AHAMMED SHIHAD UT

They win 27% of what they bid, and 18% of the value they chase.

30tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
3 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
30
30 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
16 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹76.5 L
of ₹4.2 Cr bid — 18.2% conversion
Win rate
26.7%
of 30 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count30 bids
26.7%
20.0%
53.3%
Awarded826.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected620.0%
Lost1653.3%
By value₹4.2 Cr
18.2%
18.2%
63.5%
Awarded₹76.5 L18.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹76.5 L18.2%
Lost₹2.7 Cr63.5%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹62.5 L81.6%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹76.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
V. LIYAKATHALI4 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹32.8 L
won head-to-head
02
K.K. UMMER KOYA1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹6.8 L
won head-to-head
03
MUHAMMAD BASITH E0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
ABDUL MAJEED T1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹1.7 L
won head-to-head
05
MOHAMMED NIYAS A.K.0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
salim1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹2.5 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAHAMMED SHIHAD awardedOthers

About AHAMMED SHIHAD UT

AHAMMED SHIHAD UT appears as a bidder on 30 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 30 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 26.7% win rate — worth ₹76.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 81.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against V. LIYAKATHALI, K.K. UMMER KOYA and MUHAMMAD BASITH E. V. LIYAKATHALI bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; AHAMMED SHIHAD UT won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.