Competitor profile

Agrawal Chapakal Centre

They win 38% of what they bid, and 38% of the value they chase.

17tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
22 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
16
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.0 Cr
of ₹7.9 Cr bid — 37.6% conversion
Win rate
37.5%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count16 bids
37.5%
62.5%
Awarded637.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1062.5%
By value₹7.9 Cr
37.6%
62.4%
Awarded₹3.0 Cr37.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹5.0 Cr62.4%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

DWSD EinC₹2.5 Cr82.8%
BCD EinC₹51.5 L17.2%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹3.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Rajesh Kumar Sharma4 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹3.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/S SAMAR ENTERPRISES0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
ABHISHEK KUMAR SINGH2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹85.0 L
won head-to-head
04
LOK ENTERPRISES1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹9.5 L
won head-to-head
05
ARTI KUMARI2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹32.8 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S KULDIP PRASAD1 win · 1 shared tender
₹12.5 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAgrawal Chapakal awardedOthers

About Agrawal Chapakal Centre

Agrawal Chapakal Centre appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 37.5% win rate — worth ₹3.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is DWSD EinC, at 82.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Rajesh Kumar Sharma, M/S SAMAR ENTERPRISES and ABHISHEK KUMAR SINGH. Rajesh Kumar Sharma bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; Agrawal Chapakal Centre won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.